What is the difference between drone surveying and traditional surveying?

Drone surveying has several advantages over traditional surveying; it is faster, less expensive, safer, more accurate, and efficient, and can be used in a variety of environments and conditions. Traditionally, surveying has been done on foot or with ground equipment, such as total stations or GPS receivers. Drone surveying is better in every way than traditional methods. Being less tedious, cost-effective, accurate and safe, the UAV can be used for surveys in all sectors, so its use has no limits.

All of this justifies the increase in the number of surveyors who now prefer unmanned aerial vehicles over traditional methods. Drone surveying is much more likely to suffer delays compared to traditional surveying. The main culprit is the weather, followed by permits from aviation authorities. I completed the ground school training and exam with Survey Drones Ireland and then completed the flight test.

It's probably fair to say that most debates on this topic will promote the immense and endless capabilities of drone surveying. Periodic studies carried out with drones allow teams to monitor progress, detect errors, and align with drawings to detect deviations. As the technology, capacity, and flexibility of drones develop, the industry is starting to compete more and more with traditional surveying methods. I found the instructor very useful throughout the course, since he covered everything and, after the course and the exams, he was still very helpful, so I would highly recommend Survey Drones Ireland.

Allen Geomatics, a surveying and consulting company from Advance, North Carolina, needed to survey and map a 15-acre piece of land with a stream bed and a long, steep ridge near a level road. In many cases, this authorization is still necessary for traditional surveys, but more suspicion will arise about the use of a drone. With a drone solution, vast areas of fields, quarries and roads can be inspected in one day, instead of several days when crews use traditional methods. Drones are fantastic tools for surveying; however, it's critical to remember that they are not a one-size-fits-all solution and that operators must strive to present honest and accurate data to the customer.

Instead, a drone can collect these measurements autonomously, following a pre-established flight path that the pilot can quickly set up using the drone's corresponding flight application. The increase in the costs of land surveying also means that it is not prudent to carry out periodic studies. This is impressive, highlighting, in a nutshell, how drones compare to traditional surveying methods. However, Jeff Allen, president of Allen Geomatics, is interested in learning more about drone surveying, and the Microdrones team thought this would be an ideal project to introduce the company to its LiDAR capabilities for drones.

The Leica TS16 total station and the GS18T receiver, available from Survey Instrument Services, are examples of instruments used for this surveying method.